Mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for on-site employees

IATF issued a resolution requiring on-site employees to get Covid-19 vaccination. The mandate depends on whether employees are eligible or not for the vaccine. Employees may continue to refuse to get the vaccine subject to them getting and paying for their own RT-PCR tests and, if not available, antigen tests.

1. Employees on-site required to have Covid-19 vaccination

It finally happened. Covid-19 vaccine has been required for employees working on-site.

The Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF) issued Resolution No. 148-B, Series of 2021 (henceforth “IATF 2021-148-B”), dated 11 November 2021. In the Resolution, it required all establishments and employers – without exception – “to require eligible employees who are tasked to do on-site work to be vaccinated against Covid-19.”

To quote the specific provision:

“A. In areas where there are sufficient supplies of COVID-19 vaccines as determined by the National Vaccines Operation Center (NVOC), all establishments and employers in the public and private sector shall require their eligible employees who are tasked to do on-site work to be vaccinated against COVID-19. x x x” (Emphasis supplied.)

a. Both private and public

Since the Resolution indicated all establishments and employers, without providing for an exception, this means that this applies to both the private and public sectors.

b. For eligible employees

The phrase “eligible employees” should be carefully considered as these suggest that those who are not eligible are not covered by this Resolution. Since it is not defined in the Resolution, “eligible employees” will be read in its usual or plain and simple language, which means that they refer to those who can medically take the vaccine.

Accordingly, non-eligible employees refer to the opposite or employees who cannot medically take the vaccine for some reason or another. This, however, cannot be presumed. For employees to assert that they are not eligible, they cannot simply make such a claim since it is grounded on a medical reason. Meaning, they have to obtain a medical certificate or clearance.

c. Medical clearance

In the Resolution, non-eligible employees may present any of the following to serve as sufficient and valid proof of ineligibility for vaccination:

1) A medical certificate or clearance from the Municipal Health Office (MHO), City Health Office (CHO), and/or Provincial Health Office; or,

2) Birth certificate.

It is not clear why the Resolution listed birth certificate as one of the valid proof. A birth certificate does not not usually indicate medical information that may be relevant for determining eligibility for Covid-19 vaccination.

2. No termination for employees who refuse vaccination

Notwithstanding, the Resolution clearly stated that eligible employees who continue to refuse vaccination “may not be terminated solely by reason thereof.” Otherwise stated, refusal to get a Covid-19 vaccine is and remains to be not a just cause for dismissal. For an employee to be subject to disciplinary action, including dismissal, it has to be premised on established just causes under the Labor Code and jurisprudence.

One such reason may be submitting a false or fake medical certificate to misrepresent their ineligibility to take the vaccine. Depending on the circumstances, such a misbehavior may constitute serious misconduct and/or fraud which are just causes under the Labor Code.

a. Regular RT-PCR tests at employee’s expense

Further, the Resolution states that employees who continue to refuse Covid-19 vaccination “shall be required to undergo RT-PCR tests regularly at their own expense for purposes of on-site work.” If RT-PCR capacity is insufficient or not immediately available, they may resort to antigen tests.

This provision suggests that the employees who refuse Covid-19 vaccination may continue to report to work and may not be prohibited from doing so by the employer so long as these employees undergo RT-PCR or, if unavailable, antigen tests, at their own expense.



1) IATF Resolution No. 148-B, Series of 2021

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Top Read

Company practice

1. Concept As a rule, “practice” or “custom” is not a source of a legally demandable or enforceable right. In labor cases, however, benefits which

FAQ: Premium pay

The following are the most frequently asked questions and their answers. What is a premium pay? A premium pay is an additional pay granted to

Holiday Pay

Holiday pay is a an additional pay provided to a covered employee during regular holidays.

Videos & Podcasts

RSS Labor Law PH YouTube
  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

Labor Principles

No work, no pay

Summary ▪ The principle of no-work, no pay is the basic factor in determining employee wages. ▪ This is based on the age-old rule of

See more

Related content

DOLE Regional Director

The Regional Director of the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE Regional Director) has jurisdiction over certain cases. The DOLE Regional Director has the power

Work Supervision

1. Summary ⦁ Work supervision is a management prerogative. ⦁ Employers are required to observe due diligence in the supervision of its employees. ⦁ Employers

Overtime Pay

Overtime pay is an additional pay provided to a covered employee who has rendered overtime work.

Premium Pay

Premium pay is an additional pay provided to a covered employee who renders work during non-work days, such as a rest day or a special non-working day.

error: Content is protected.