Medical representative tricked into resigning and signing a quitclaim

three person looking at x ray result

The employee was hired as a medical representative and then became a product manager of the employer, a pharmaceutical company. Sometime thereafter, the employer announced a merger with another company and thus “the employees were advised to keep their options open and to look for other jobs.” Being a family man, the employee looked for employment elsewhere. When he found another employer, he tendered his resignation and signed a quitclaim after receiving his benefits. Later, it was discovered by the company union that a buy-out of the employer’s assets, and not a merger, was being discussed. Thus, after bargaining, the company union successfully negotiated for a retrenchment package consisting of three months’ pay for every year of service. Learning of this, the complainant filed for illegal dismissal.

Labor Law Case: Wyeth-Suaco Laboratories, Inc. v. NLRC, Santos, G.R. No. 100658, 02 March 1993

Share:

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Related content

FAQ: Management prerogative

What is management prerogative? Management prerogative is the bundle of rights inherent to the employer who gets to decide all

Fixed-Term Employment Contract

1. Summary ▪ A fixed-term employment contract is an employment arrangement between an employer and a fixed-term employee wherein the

Cases: Service incentive leave

These are the related Labor Law Cases or Jurisprudence. 1. Covered employees a. Covered employees 1) Rank-and-file employees Ramil v.

Labor Standards

Labor standards refer to legally-mandated benefits required to be given to the employees by the employer or, in some cases,

Cases: Moonlighting

1. Moonlighting a. Unauthorized use of company time Capitol Wireless, Inc. v. Balagot G.R. No. 169016, 31 January 2007 [BACKGROUND]

Equipoise rule

Summary ▪ When the evidence in labor cases is in equipoise, doubt is resolved in favor of the employee. 1.

error: Content is protected.