Retraction letter


▪ A retraction letter is a formal written notice from the employer informing a job candidate of the withdrawal of the employment offer.

1. Concept

A retraction letter is a formal written notice from the employer informing a job candidate who have been signed for employment that the latter is being withdrawn.

a. Validity

Q: Is a retraction letter involving an employment contract with suspensive conditions valid?

A: Yes, provided that the employment contract is clear with the suspensive conditions.

Case Law

Sagun v. ANZ Global Services and Operations (Manila), Inc.
G.R. No. 220399, 22 August 2016

An applicant signed an employment contract with suspensive conditions stating that the employment is conditioned on the Company’s satisfaction with the results of his pre-employment requirements, particularly on background checks.

• On his scheduled first day of work, he tendered a resignation letter to his previous employer and submitted a copy thereof to the Company as part of the pre-employment requirements.

• On the same day, the Company tendered him a retraction letter after finding inconsistencies with his last two (2) employer.


• The employment contract was perfected; however, it did not become efffective due to suspensive conditions.

• While there was already a perfected contract of employment when the complainant signed the Company’s employment offer and agreed to the terms and conditions that were embodied therein, it was nonetheless subjected to several conditions before he may be deemed an employee of the Company.

• Among those conditions for employment was the “satisfactory completion of any checks (e.g. background, bankruptcy, sanctions and reference checks) that may be required by ANZ.” Accordingly, the complainant’s employment with the Company depended on the outcome of his background check, which partakes of the nature of a suspensive condition, and hence, renders the obligation of the would-be employer, conditional.

• Here, the subject employment contract required a satisfactory completion of the complainant’s background check before he may be deemed an employee of the Company.

• Considering, however, that the complainant failed to explain the discrepancies in his declared information and documents that were required from him relative to his work experience at Siemens, namely: (a) that he was only a Level 1 and not a Level 2 Technical Support Representative that conducts troubleshooting for both computer hardware and software problems; and (b) that he was found to have been terminated for cause and not merely resigned from his post, that rendered his background check unsatisfactory, the Company’s obligations as a would-be employer were held in suspense and thus, had yet to acquire any obligatory force. To reiterate, in a contract with a suspensive condition, if the condition does not happen, the obligation does not come into effect. Thus, until and unless petitioner complied with the satisfactory background check, there exists no obligation on the part of the Company to recognize and fully accord him the rights under the employment contract. In fact, records also show that petitioner failed to report for work on or before July 11, 2011, which was also a suspensive condition mandated under sub-paragraph 4 of Schedule 1 of the contract.



▪ Presidential Decree No. 442, a.k.a. Labor Code of the Philippines

▪ Civil Code of the Philippines

▪ Jurisprudence or Supreme Court Decisions

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

See more

Related Posts

Authorized Cause Procedure

Summary ▪ Authorized cause procedure refers to the steps or process of implementing due process in relation to separation from employment. ▪ There are 3

Burden of proof

Summary ▪ Burden of proof shifts between the employer and the employee depending on what is being claimed. ▪ In monetary claims, burden of proof

Masterclass has begun!

Labor Law Part 1 – Masterclass — began two (2) days ago, March 21 (Monday). In the next six (6) months, participants will be immersed

error: Content is protected.