No Work, No Pay

Summary

▪ The principle of no-work, no pay is the basic factor in determining employee wages.

▪ This is based on the age-old rule of “a fair day’s wage for a fair day’s work.”

▪ If the employee is ready, willing, and able to do work, but is prevented form working, he is paid.

1. Concept

A fair day’s wage for a fair day’s labor is the principle behind no work, no pay

The age-old rule governing the relation between labor and capital, or management and employee of a ‘fair day’s wage for a fair day’s labor’ remains as the basic factor in determining employees’ wages. (Aklan Electric Cooperative Incorporated v. NLRC, Retiso, G.R. No. 121439, 25 January 2000)

2. When an employee is prevented from working

“If there is no work performed by the employee there can be no wage or pay unless, of course, the laborer was able, willing and ready to work but was illegally locked out, suspended or dismissed, or otherwise illegally prevented from working… It would neither be fair nor just to allow (the complainants) to recover something they have not earned and could not have earned because they did not render services at the Kalibo office during the stated period.” (Ibid.)

If there is no work performed by the employee there can be no wage or pay, unless of course the laborer was able, willing and ready to work but was illegally locked out, dismissed or suspended. The “No work, no pay” principle contemplates a “no work” situation where the employees voluntarily absent themselves.” (Republic of the Philippines v. Pacheco, G.R. No. 178021, 25 January 2012, cited in Protective Maximum Security Agency, Inc. v. Fuenter, G.R. No. 169303, 11 February 2015)

References

▪ Jurisprudence or Supreme Court Decisions

Similar Posts

  • Cases: 13th month pay

    1. Kinds of employees a. Rank-and-file employees Ramil v. Stoneleaf, Inc. G.R. No. 222416, 17 June 2020 [BACKGROUND] [The employee was hired as a Spa Supervisor and Massage Therapist by the employer, a Spa and Wellness Center. She received a monthly salary of P10,000.00 and P100.00 per massage service rendered. She was also an incorporator/director…

  • Company Practice

    1. Concept As a rule, “practice” or “custom” is not a source of a legally demandable or enforceable right. In labor cases, however, benefits which were voluntarily given by the employer, and which have ripened into company practice, are considered as rights and are subject to the non-diminution rule. To be considered a company practice,…

  • FAQ: Overtime Pay

    1. In General See: FAQ: Statutory Monetary Benefits. The above FAQ covers frequently asked questions with their answers (FAQ) involving statutory monetary benefits in terms of general application, i.e., the questions and answers apply to all forms of statutory monetary benefits, including this current benefit. Thus, the following questions and answers are specific only to…

  • Cases: Holiday pay

    1. Covered and excluded Clientlogic Philippines, Inc. v. Castro G.R. No. 186070, 11 April 2011 [RESOLUTION] [The employers] argue in the main that, as a team supervisor, [the employee] was a member of the managerial staff; hence, he is not entitled to overtime pay, rest day pay, holiday pay, and service incentive leave pay. x…

  • Eastern Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. v. ETEU (2012)

    Eastern Telecommunications Philippines, Inc. v. Eastern Telecoms Employees Union, G.R. No. 185665, February 8, 2012, Mendoza, J.: 1. Background • Eastern Telecommunications Phils., Inc. (ETPI) is a corporation engaged in the business of providing telecommunications facilities, particularly leasing international date lines or circuits, regular landlines, internet and data services, employing approximately 400 employees. • Eastern…