LABORLAW.PH is the primary learning and resource site for Philippine Labor and Employment Laws.
Similar Posts
FAQ: Holiday pay
1. In General See: FAQ: Statutory Monetary Benefits. The above FAQ covers frequently asked questions with their answers (FAQ) involving statutory monetary benefits in terms of general application, i.e., the questions and answers apply to all forms of statutory monetary benefits, including this current benefit. Thus, the following questions and answers are specific only to…
Peckson v. Robinsons Supermarket Corporation (2013)
Peckson v. Robinsons Supermarket Corporation, G.R. No. 198534, July 3, 2013, Reyes, J.: 1. Background • The [complainant-employee] first joined the Robinsons Supermarket Corporation (RSC) as a Sales Clerk on November 3, 1987. On October 26, 2006, she was holding the position of Category Buyer when respondent Roena Sarte (Sarte), RSC’s Assistant Vice-President for Merchandising,…
Five J Taxi v. NLRC (1994)
Five J Taxi v. NLRC, G.R. No. 111474, August 22, 1994, Regalado, J.: 1. Background • [The Complainants] Domingo Maldigan and Gilberto Sabsalon were hired by [the Company] as taxi drivers 2 and, as such, they worked for 4 days weekly on a 24-hour shifting schedule. Aside from the daily “boundary” of P700.00 for air-conditioned…
Cases: Holiday pay
1. Covered and excluded Clientlogic Philippines, Inc. v. Castro G.R. No. 186070, 11 April 2011 [RESOLUTION] [The employers] argue in the main that, as a team supervisor, [the employee] was a member of the managerial staff; hence, he is not entitled to overtime pay, rest day pay, holiday pay, and service incentive leave pay. x…
Security guard signs a pro-forma resignation letter with quitclaim
The employee was hired as a security guard by the employer, a security service provider. After inquiring from the employer’s client whether their backwages were already paid to the employer, he was allegedly relieved from his post and never given another assignment. In exchange for paying his money claims, he was allegedly instructed to copy…
Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (2004)
Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union, G.R. No. 148738, June 29, 2004, Callejo, Sr., J.: 1. Background • [The Company] Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation (MMPC) is a domestic corporation engaged in the assembly and distribution of Mitsubishi motor vehicles. • Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (CPLU) is a legitimate labor organization and the…
