Moral damages


▪ Moral damages may be awarded in certain cases.

▪ Bad faith must be clearly proven.

1. Concept

Moral damages are awarded in illegal termination cases when the employer acted:

1) In bad faith or fraud;

2) In a manner oppressive to labor; or,

3) In a manner contrary to morals, good customs, or public policy. (Daguinod v. Southgate Foods, Inc., G.R. No. 227795, 20 February 2019)

The nature of moral damages is defined under our Civil Code. Article 2220 states that “[w]illful injury to property may be a legal ground for awarding moral damages if the court should find that, under the circumstances, such damages are justly due. The same rule applies to breaches of contract where the defendant acted fraudulently or in bad faith.” (Montinola v. PAL, G.R. No. 198656, 08 September 2014)

a. Bad faith

Bad faith “implies a conscious and intentional design to do a wrongful act for a dishonest purpose or moral obliquity.” (Ibid.)

Bad faith must be proven through clear and convincing evidence. This is because “[b]adfaith and fraud… are serious accusations that can be so conveniently and casually invoked, and that is why they are never presumed. They amount to mere slogans or mudslinging unless convincingly substantiated by whoever is alleging them.” (Ibid.)

2. Illegal dismissal

Moral damages are recoverable where the dismissal of the employee was attended by bad faith or fraud or constituted an act oppressive to labor, or was done in a manner contrary to morals, good customs or public policy. (Cosue v. Ferritz Integrated Development Corporation, G.R. No. 230664, 24 July 2017)

3. Illegal suspension

Moral damages are appropriate also in illegal suspension. Unemployment “brings untold hardships and sorrows on those dependent on the wage-earner.” This is also true for the case of suspension. Suspension is temporary unemployment. The deprivation of economic compensation causes the employee mental anguish, fright, serious anxiety, besmirched reputation, and wounded feelings. All these are grounds for an award of moral damages under the Civil Code. (Montinola v. PAL, supra.)



Republic Act No. 386, a.k.a. Civil Code of the Philippines

Presidential Decree No. 442, a.k.a. Labor Code of the Philippines

DOLE Department Order No. 147, Series of 2015

▪ Jurisprudence or Supreme Court Decisions

Content Details

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected. Please refer to our full Disclaimer.

For updates: If the legal provisions being discussed have been amended or repealed by legislation or has been the subject of a Supreme Court decision which may have impacted how it is interpreted, do let us know so we can consider for the next update. Reach out via our Contact Us

Videos & Podcasts

Top Read

Computation of holiday pay

During regular holidays, 100% pay if there is no work and 200% pay if there is work. During double holidays or two regular holidays falling

No work, no pay

Summary ▪ The principle of no-work, no pay is the basic factor in determining employee wages. ▪ This is based on the age-old rule of

13th Month Pay

13th month pay is provided to covered rank-and-file employees who have rendered at least one (1) month of service.

DOLE Updates

See more

Related content