Non-resident Alien Employees

Updated on

1. Summary

▪ Foreigners or non-resident aliens are required to obtain an alien employment permit (AEP) prior to working in the Philippines.

▪ They are prohibited from transferring employment without prior approval from the DOLE Secretary.

▪ An employment contract is void if there is no alien employment permit.

2. Concept

Any foreigner or alien seeking admission to the Philippines for employment purposes and any domestic or foreign employer who desires to engage an alien for employment in the Philippines shall obtain an alien employment permit (AEP) from the Department of Labor and Employment. (Article 40, Labor Code)

3. Requirements

The employment permit may be issued to a non-resident alien or to the applicant employer after a determination of the non-availability of a person in the Philippines who is competent, able and willing at the time of application to perform the services for which the alien is desired. (Paragraph 2, Article 40, Ibid.)

For an enterprise registered in preferred areas of investments, said alien employment permit may be issued upon recommendation of the government agency charged with the supervision of said registered enterprise. (Paragraph 3, Article 40, Ibid.)

4. Prohibition against transfer of employment

After the issuance of an alien employment permit, the alien shall not transfer to another job or change his employer without prior approval of the DOLE Secretary. (Article 41[a], Ibid.)

Any non-resident alien who shall take up employment in violation of the foregoing rules and the implementing rules and regulations shall be punished in accordance with the provisions of Articles 289 and 290 of the Labor Code. (Article 41[b], Ibid.)

In addition, the alien worker shall be subject to deportation after service of his sentence. (Paragraph 2, Article 41, Ibid.)

5. No AEP, employment contract is void

Absent an employment permit, any employment relationship that a foreign national contemplated with a local Company is void for being contrary to law. A void or inexistent contract, in turn, has no force and effect from the beginning as if it had never been entered into. Thus, without an Alien Employment Permit, an employment contract is void and cannot be the source of a right or obligation. ( McBurnie v. Ganzon, EGI-Managers, Inc., G.R. Nos. 178934 & 178117, 186984-85, 17 October 2013)

..

References

▪ P.D. 442, Labor Code of the Philippines

▪ Jurisprudence or Supreme Court Decisions

Labor Law PH

LABORLAW.PH is the primary learning and resource site for Philippine Labor and Employment Laws.

Similar Posts

  • Apprentices

    Apprentices are workers covered by an apprenticeship agreement involving an apprenticeable occupation which requires more than three (3) months of practical training on the job supplemented by related theoretical instruction. 1. Concepts “Apprenticeship” – means practical training on the job supplemented by related theoretical instruction. (Article 58[a], P.D. 442, Labor Code) “Apprentice” – is a…

  • Project Employment Contract

    Summary ⦁ A project employment contract is an employment arrangement between an employer and a project employee wherein the latter’s employment has been fixed for a specific project or undertaking. ⦁ The project’s completion or termination should be determined or determinable at the time of the engagement of the project employee. ⦁ The existence of…

  • Surface Mine Workers

    1. Concepts “Surface mine workers” – shall only include mill plant workers, electrical, mechanical and tailings pond personnel. (Paragraph 6, Article 302, P.D. 442, Labor Code, as amended by R.A. 10757) 2. Retirement An underground or surface mining employee upon reaching the age of fifty (50) years or more, but not beyond sixty (60) years…

  • Universal Robina Sugar Milling v. Acibo (2019)

    Universal Robina Sugar Milling Corporation v. Acibo, G.R. No. 186439, 15 January 2019, Brion, J.: 1. Background • The [Company] maintain[s] that [the Complainants] are contractual or project/seasonal workers and not regular employees of [the Company]. They thus argue that the [Court of Appeals] erred in applying the legal parameters and guidelines for regular employment…