LABORLAW.PH is the primary learning and resource site for Philippine Labor and Employment Laws.
Similar Posts
Bance v. University of St. Anthony (2021)
See: Original Decision Bance v. University of St. Anthony and Santiago Ortega, Jr., G.R. No. 202724, February 3, 2021, Per Hernando, J.: 1. Background • The Petitioners Susan M. Bance (Bance), Arlene C. Dimaiwat (Dimaiwat), Jean O. Velasco (Velasco), Nancy M. Aguirre (Aguirre), and Hazel A. Lobetania (Lobetania; collectively, [the [Employees]) filed complaints for illegal…
Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (2004)
Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union, G.R. No. 148738, June 29, 2004, Callejo, Sr., J.: 1. Background • [The Company] Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation (MMPC) is a domestic corporation engaged in the assembly and distribution of Mitsubishi motor vehicles. • Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (CPLU) is a legitimate labor organization and the…
Niña Jewelry Manufacturing of Metal Arts, Inc. v. Montecillo (2011)
Niña Jewelry Manufacturing of Metal Arts, Inc. v. Montecillo, G.R. No. 188169, November 28, 2011, Per Reyes, J.: 1. Background • Madeline Montecillo (Madeline) and Liza Trinidad (Liza), hereinafter referred to collectively as [the Complainants], were first employed as goldsmiths by [the Company] Niña Jewelry Manufacturing of Metal Arts, Inc. (Niña Jewelry) in 1996 and…
Cases: Willful Disobedience
1. Transfer of employees Transfer of employees is a management prerogative. Running a business is filled with difficulties and challenges, particularly when it comes to managing human resource. As such, the employer is given a wide latitude to regulate all aspects of employment via the management prerogative – to ensure the success of the company…
Five J Taxi v. NLRC (1994)
Five J Taxi v. NLRC, G.R. No. 111474, August 22, 1994, Regalado, J.: 1. Background • [The Complainants] Domingo Maldigan and Gilberto Sabsalon were hired by [the Company] as taxi drivers 2 and, as such, they worked for 4 days weekly on a 24-hour shifting schedule. Aside from the daily “boundary” of P700.00 for air-conditioned…
Echo 2000 Commercial Corporation v. Obrero Filipino-Echo 2000 Chapter-CLO (2016)
Echo 2000 Commercial Corporation v. Obrero Filipino-Echo 2000 Chapter-CLO, G.R. No. 214092, January 11, 2016, Reyes, J.: 1. Background • Echo is a provider of warehousing management and delivery services. • King 8 Commercial Corporation (King 8), Echo’s predecessor, initially employed Cortes on September 17, 2002, and Somido, on October 12, 2004. Echo thereafter absorbed…
