Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (2004)

Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation v. Chrysler Philippines Labor Union, G.R. No. 148738, June 29, 2004, Callejo, Sr., J.: 1. Background • [The Company] Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corporation (MMPC) is a domestic corporation engaged in the assembly and distribution of Mitsubishi motor vehicles. • Chrysler Philippines Labor Union (CPLU) is a legitimate labor organization and the duly certified bargaining agent of the hourly-paid regular rank and file employees of MMPC. • Nelson Paras was a member of CPLU. • Nelson Paras was first employed by MMPC as a shuttle bus driver on March 19, 1976. He resigned on June 16, 1982. He applied for and was hired as a diesel mechanic and heavy equipment operator in Saudi Arabia from 1982 to 1993. When he returned to the Philippines, he was re-hired as a welder-fabricator at the MMPC tooling shop from October 3, 1994 to October 31, 1994.2 On October 29, 1994, his contract was renewed from November 1, 1994 up to March 3, 1995. • Sometime in May of 1996, Paras was re-hired on a probationary basis as a manufacturing trainee at the Plant Engineering Maintenance Department. He and the new and re-hired employees were given an orientation on May 15, 19964 by Emma P. Aninipot, respecting the company’s history, corporate philosophy, organizational structure, and company rules and regulations, including the company standards for regularization, code of conduct and company-provided benefits. • Paras started reporting for work on May 27, 1996. He ...

Log in below.

Similar Posts

  • FAQ: Premium pay

    1. In General See: FAQ: Statutory Monetary Benefits. The above FAQ covers frequently asked questions with their answers (FAQ) involving statutory monetary benefits in terms of general application, i.e., the questions and answers apply to all forms of statutory monetary benefits, including this current benefit. Thus, the following questions and answers are specific only to…

  • Burden of Proof

    Summary ▪ Burden of proof shifts between the employer and the employee depending on what is being claimed. ▪ In monetary claims, burden of proof is on the employer if the claims refer to those incurred in the normal course of business, as opposed to those that are not such as requiring overtime work or…

  • Disciplinary Action

    In the world of private sector employment, it does happen that a few employees underperform and/or commit violations. The employer is allowed by law to impose disciplinary actions against these erring employees to correct unlikable behavior. As a result, sanctions or penalties may be imposed ranging from verbal warning, written reprimand, suspension without pay, and…

  • Abasolo v. NLRC (2000)

    CASE DETAILS Case Title                           Abasolo v. NLRC Citation G.R. No. 119475, November 29, 2000 Penned by De Leon, Jr., J. 1. Background • [The Company] La Union Tobacco Redrying Corporation (LUTORCO), which is owned by private respondent See Lin Chan, is engaged in the business of buying, selling, redrying and processing of tobacco leaves…