Hepatitis B Test

1. What is a pre-employment requirement?

A pre-employment requirement is one that is required to be done as part of the requirements prior to employment. It may be in the form of documentary submission, a medical examination, or an assessment or evaluation of an individual’s knowledge, skills, and competence.

2. Pre-employment requirement as a management prerogative

The employer may set the pre-employment requirements in line with its exercise of its management prerogative. However, there are labor laws and regulations which regulate certain pre-employment requirements, such as whether a requirement may be allowed by the employer, who should pay for any associated costs, and so on.

See also:
⦁ Management prerogative
⦁ Cases on: Management prerogative
⦁ FAQ: Management prerogative

3. Hepatitis B as a pre-employment requirement

DOLE Department Advisory No. 05, Series of 2010 (“DA-05”), also known as the Guidelines for the Implementation of a Workplace Policy and Program on Hepatitis B, serves as the regulation for anything that concerns Hepatitis B at the workplace.

a. Confidentiality

In relation to Hepatitis B test as a pre-employment requirement, DA-05 provides:

2. Confidentiality
Job applicants and workers shall not be compelled to disclose their Hepatitis B status and other related medical information. Co-workers shall not be obliged to reveal any personal information about fellow workers. Access to personal data relating to a worker’s Hepatitis B status shall be bound by the rules of confidentiality and shall be strictly limited to medical personnel or if legally required.
Part III, Section C, DOLE DA-05

Related to the above-cited confidentiality provision, Hepatitis B test result is a personal information about an individual’s health, which is classified as a sensitive personal information under R.A. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012.

b. Non-discriminatory policy and practices

DA-05 further provides:

1. Non-discriminatory Policy and Practices
a. There shall be no discrimination of any form against workers on the basis of their Hepatitis B status consistent with international agreements on non-discrimination ratified by the Philippines (ILO C111).  Workers shall not be discriminated against, from pre- to post-employment, including hiring, promotion, or assignment, because of their Hepatitis B status.
b. Individuals found to be Hepatitis B positive shall not be declared unfit to work without appropriate medical evaluation and counseling;
c. Workers shall not be terminated on the basis of the actual, perceived, or suspected Hepatitis B status;
d. Workplace management of sick employees shall not differ from that of any other illness.  Persons with Hepatitis-B related illness should be able to work for as long as they are medically fit.
Part III, Section C, DOLE DA-05

In the above cited provision, particularly in No. 1(a), it made mention that there should be no discrimination on workers from pre- to post-employment. The provision covers job applicants as they are those who are covered by pre-employment. Thus, job applicants should not be discriminated during the pre-employment process if they have previously tested for positive for Hepatitis B.

c. Not be declared unfit to work

DA-05 provides:

1. Non-discriminatory Policy and Practices
b. Individuals found to be Hepatitis B positive shall not be declared unfit to work without appropriate medical evaluation and counseling;
Part III, Section C, DOLE DA-05

Similarly, employers should avoid and refrain from automatically considering job applicants or employees as unfit to work. As provided in the above-cited provision, there should be appropriate medical evaluation and counseling. This is because it is a medical concern requiring proper intervention of a medical professional, who will be able to make a better assessment of the employee and determine whether or not the employee is fit or unfit for work.

Forms & Templates

⦁ DOLE-prescribed Hepatitis B Workplace Policies and Programs

References

⦁ DOLE Department Advisory No. 05, Series of 2010

⦁ R.A. 10173, Data Privacy Act of 2012

⦁ Mayo Clinic, Hepatitis B

Similar Posts

  • Drug Test

    Making a job applicant take a drug test as a pre-employment requirement is an exercise of management prerogative. What’s the legal basis? It appears that there is confusion on the legal basis for drug test as a pre-employment requirement. While random drug testing for those who are already employees is clearly provided for in Republic…

  • Casual Employment Contract

    Summary ⦁ A casual employment contract is an employment arrangement between an employer and a casual employee wherein the latter performs work that is incidental to the business. ⦁ Casual employees are those who perform work that is incidental to the business of the employer. ⦁ The employment of casual employees should not exceed twelve…

  • Employees

    “Employee” – includes any person in the employ of an employer. 1. Concept “Employee” – includes any person in the employ of an employer. The term shall not be limited to the employees of a particular employer, unless the Code so explicitly states. It shall include any individual whose work has ceased as a result…

  • Field Personnel

    1. Concept Field personnel – refers to ‘non-agricultural employees who regularly perform their duties away from the principal place of business or branch office of the employer and whose actual hours of work in the field cannot be determined with reasonable certainty.’ (Paragraph 3, Article 82, P.D.442, Labor Code; See also Section 1[e], Rule II,…

  • Minors

    Minors – refer to individuals who are below legal age. 1. Concepts “Child” or “Children” refers to person below eighteen (18) years of age or those over but are unable to fully take care of themselves or protect themselves from abuse, neglect, cruelty, exploitation or discrimination because of a physical or mental disability or condition….

  • Employers

    “Employer” – includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly or indirectly. 1. Concept “Employer” – includes any person acting in the interest of an employer, directly or indirectly. The term shall not include any labor organization or any of its officers or agents except when acting as employer. (Article 219[e], Ibid.)…