Non-Compete Clause

Summary

▪ A non-compete agreement in an employment contract is valid.

▪ The NDA should cover confidential matters only.

1. Concept

A non-compete clause is a contractual stipulation whereby one party is prohibited from competing against the other contracting party in a similar activity for a certain period.

A non-compete clause is valid as a post-employment restriction.

A non-compete clause “with a stipulation that a violation thereof makes the employee liable to his former employer for liquidated damages, refers to post-employment relations of the parties.” (Portillo v. Lietz, G.R. No. 196539, 10 October 2012)

2. Prohibition on competing

What the similar activity may be will depend on the wording of the clause.

The clause may stipulate that the employee is prohibited from joining a direct competitor of the employer. It may also be worded to being prohibited form engaging in a similar business or undertaking against the employer. Or, for the many non-compete clauses, it may cover both future employment and business.

3. Duration

The duration of the prohibition against competing cannot be the lifetime of the employee. This is because it will run against public policy. The employee should not be permanently barred from earning a livelihood where she may be good at.

On the other hand, the law does not set or prescribe a limitation on the duration. The only limitation imposed on such clauses is that it should be reasonable in that industry or business.

Thus, it is possible that the duration may be during the employment period only. Alternatively, the non-compete may extend even after leaving employment, such as after (one) 1 year and others for up to (two) 2 years. It is possible that the duration may be longer. The key is for the employer to prove that such duration is reasonable in their industry should the employee challenge the duration in court. These industries may include research and development, pharmaceutical development, and so on.

4. Employment contract, company policies, CBA

The above discussions may be superseded by any stipulation favorable to the employee via an employment contract, company policies, collective bargaining agreement, or analogous thereto.

..

References

Book IV – Obligations and Contracts, Republic Act No. 386, a.k.a. Civil Code of the Philippines

▪ Jurisprudence or Supreme Court Decisions

Share:

Disclaimer: All information is for educational and general information only. These should not be taken as professional legal advice or opinion. Please consult a competent lawyer to address your specific concerns. Any statements or opinions of the author are solely his own and do not reflect that of any organization he may be connected.

Related content

FAQ: Management prerogative

What is management prerogative? Management prerogative is the bundle of rights inherent to the employer who gets to decide all

Fixed-Term Employment Contract

1. Summary ▪ A fixed-term employment contract is an employment arrangement between an employer and a fixed-term employee wherein the

Cases: Service incentive leave

These are the related Labor Law Cases or Jurisprudence. 1. Covered employees a. Covered employees 1) Rank-and-file employees Ramil v.

Labor Standards

Labor standards refer to legally-mandated benefits required to be given to the employees by the employer or, in some cases,

Cases: Moonlighting

1. Moonlighting a. Unauthorized use of company time Capitol Wireless, Inc. v. Balagot G.R. No. 169016, 31 January 2007 [BACKGROUND]

Equipoise rule

Summary ▪ When the evidence in labor cases is in equipoise, doubt is resolved in favor of the employee. 1.

error: Content is protected.