Similar Posts
Security guard signs a pro-forma resignation letter with quitclaim
The employee was hired as a security guard by the employer, a security service provider. After inquiring from the employer’s client whether their backwages were already paid to the employer, he was allegedly relieved from his post and never given another assignment. In exchange for paying his money claims, he was allegedly instructed to copy…
Cases: Prescriptive Period for Monetary Claims
These are the related Labor Law Cases or Jurisprudence. 1. 3 years from accrual of cause of action Philippine Long Distance Telephone Company (PLDT) v. Pingol G.R. No. 182622, 08 September 2010 [BACKGROUND] In 1979, [the employee] [R. [the employee]] was hired by petitioner PLDT as a maintenance technician. On April 13, 1999, while still…
Cases: OFWs Dismissed from Work
1. OFWS covered by security of tenure and due process a. Due process requirement 1) Sameer Overseas Placement Agency, Inc. v. Cabiles (2014) Sameer Overseas Placement Agency, Inc. v. Cabiles, En Banc, G.R. No. 170139, 05 August 2014 [BACKGROUND] [the employer – local agency], Sameer Overseas Placement Agency, Inc., is a recruitment and placement agency….
Cases: Serious Misconduct
1. Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment is “an imposition of misplaced ‘superiority’ which is enough to dampen an employee’s spirit and her capacity for advancement. It affects her sense of judgment; it changes her life.” (Domingo v. Rayala, G.R. No. 155831, 18 February 2008) In one case, the Supreme Court expressed in strong terms that sexual…
Yulo v. Concentrix Daksh Services Philippines, Inc. (2019)
Yulo v. Concentrix Daksh Services Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 235873, January 21, 2019, Perlas-Bernabe, J.: 1. Background a. Complainants’ position • [The employee] alleged that he was engaged by [the employer] on March 26, 2014 as a Customer Care Specialist-Operations, with a basic monthly salary of P12,190.00 and guaranteed allowance of ₱3,125.00. Thereafter, he was…
Celis v. Bank of Makati (A Savings Bank), Inc. (2022)
This is the case of a bank personnel who was dismissed for her failure to disclose her previous employment.
